After reading about Cognitive Learning theories and their implications in present day education it became apparent that these two things are closely related. Since cognitive learning theory is based on the assumption that we learn from making connections with previous knowledge and in essence build a “map” in our brain, we as educators have an important role of constructing those connections in our student’s “maps”. There are many educators who believe that a teacher’s effectiveness is correlated to the method of instruction and the types of resources they bring to a lesson to help their students make connections with pervious learning.
From reading our text, Using Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works, it is apparent that there are some great organization tools that will aide in making learning effective and clear. The first of these is Cues. I found it enlightening when the authors clearly stated that cues should not be ambiguous, but they should be straightforward. I have always lived under the assumption that cues were to be vague enough to not give the answer, but to guide in the right direction, but now I know that I was not helping my students learn this way. Using the method of straightforward cues, the students will get to the information faster and start to make the connections and build their “map” like we want to occur.
The next tool that I feel lends itself nicely to cognitive learning theory is using advanced organizers. Since our brain is a map, so to speak, doesn’t it make sense that we would learn best by having information neatly organized for us to learn from? I am a person that likes to have things a certain way and I can see the validity in this, but it also makes me wonder if everyone will learn with the information organized in the fashion that the teacher created? I know from my experience, I tend to organize worksheets and handouts in my classroom different than the other Math teachers, not that anyone is right or wrong, but I like how using technology to organize thoughts lets that students have some freedom in the type of layout they feel is best.
Last but not least, I was intrigued by the summarizing piece. I was unaware of some of the features that word processing software has that would make teaching summarizing a lot easier. Since the computer can easily cross out redundant information and highlight important parts, it is a great learning tool that can be projected in the classroom for the whole class to discuss. In addition, the students can use this feature to help summarize text in all kinds of classes.
In closing, I was impressed with all the types of learning tools that are available to us, as teachers, that do not cost anything out of pocket. There are so many learning tools that are based upon learning theories that try to convince us that we need to purchase additional items to be effective. I appreciate all the useful information using tools that are at our fingertips.
Resources:
Ormrod, J.E. (1999). Human learning (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall retrieved from http://teachnet.edb.utexas.edu/~Lynda_abbot/Cognitive.html
Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
I was also unaware of some of the tools in word processing. I surely plan to make use of them. Through this week's reading and videos, I learned some new strategies and technology to accompany things that I already use in the classroom. It is exciting to know that all of these tool are cost free, as you mentioned.
ReplyDeleteI too always thought more vague questions meant more thought provoking and therefore better for higher level thinking. So now my question is, what about questions that have no black or white answer?
ReplyDeleteI was also unaware of the summarizing feature in Microsoft Word. Some of the tools seemed a little bit difficult or confusing to use with my students, but the AutoSummarize tool seemed manageable with my students. Luckily, I can use my SmartBoard with this resource.
ReplyDeleteWhen you organize your math sheets, are you creating your own? Have you ever used www.themathworksheetsite.com? I have been using this site to offer extra practice for some of my students. I also use it supplement some of my lessons. For the longest time, I was creating my own. This has been such a time saver!
Jamie,
ReplyDeleteYour writing is so easy to read because it flows nicely and everything is well organized and detailed. I along with everyone else was unaware of all the extra tools available in Microsoft Word. I know I plan to spend a little more time investigating how to take better advantage of a tool I already have in my classroom.
Nancy, I have always wondered that... there is a lot to be said for debates and the ability to support your thinking, but a lot of time I want to know if I am right or wrong. I think that we as educators, need to let the students know that it is ok if there is not a right or wrong answer (for some things... but 2+2 is always going to be 4!)
ReplyDeleteMeghan,
Unfortunately, I am creating them myself. We have a textbook, but the kids do not have a copy of it. The handouts that I make become their book and mirror some of the lessons. I am looking forward to hopefully getting a new book soon once the new standards are put into effect. I have used some of the sites that you mentioned, they are helpful for practice, but I need ones that also teach new concepts. Thanks for the helpful ideas though.
If anyone tries to use the Word features in their room, please share how it goes!
Jamison,
ReplyDeleteThe use of cues is very important. It not only focuses the students for the lesson it also activates prior knowledge. With the prior knowledge activated the students have information ready to connect the new information to.